RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Employee Engagement: Noun or Verb?

Is employee engagement a noun or a verb?

If you see it as a noun, it becomes static. It becomes something we can measure once a year and know that we captured it. It is something we have versus something we are doing? It is less likely to change and more likely to remain fixed.

If engage is a verb, it is an action. It is something we do — not something we have. It is dynamic and changing. We are skeptical of a once a year measure of engagement because we know it can change daily within the same person.

I believe we need to see and work with engagement as a verb. When we do this we change our approaches to the topic at an individual, leadership, and organizational level.

  • The individual is more open to change and to change actions to engage.
  • Leaders realize the important of engaging with their staff continually.
  • Organizations become more fluid in their engagement measurements and interventions.

Are you ready to go beyond a static noun to a dynamic interaction of individuals, leaders, and organizations with work.

Engage!

Photo Credit: London in movement #13 by http://www.flickr.com/photos/fabbriciuse/2092867849/

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post4 Comment(s)

  1. Tim Wright | Dec 4, 2008 | Reply

    David,

    Full agreement here…except for the grammatical truth that “engagement” is a noun.

    So, I’m thinking of the beauty of the verb-based phrase: engaging employees.

    That’s an action that belongs to and can be fulfilled by all concerned: leadership, management, and (most importantly) employees themselves.

    Plus its a wonderful indication of what employees then become, especially to customers and clients: engaging!

    What more could the company ask!

    Tim

  2. David Zinger | Dec 4, 2008 | Reply

    Hi Tim,
    Hopefully that don’t ask much more but focus on what they can contribute as active verbs in the engagement process. Thank you for your comment.
    David

  3. Eric Klein | Dec 5, 2008 | Reply

    So true.

    And the same goes for being a “leader”.
    Leadership is a verb - something that we do. We don’t have leadership because of position. We practice leadership because of our sense of purpose.

    Thanks for this reminder.

  4. David Zinger | Dec 5, 2008 | Reply

    Eric,
    I think it may be true for all of living. We need to be dynamic (verbs) over static (nouns).
    David

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

  • Free Monthly Newletter

    Subscribe to Take-5
    Email:  

  • Network

    ee
    Join over 685 members on our Employee Engagement Network hosted by David Zinger Click here

  • Free Book

    Keys of Employee Engagement

    12 Authors and 300 ideas presented in Employee Engagement Alphabets.

    Click here to download or read a PDF version of this eclectic and informative book.

  • RSS Email Updates

    Receive the latest articles by email. Enter your email in the box below.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Alltops

    Featured in Alltop
  • Definition

    EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT enriches everyone in the workplace. It is not sucking out more discretionary effort from employees.

    Authentic employee engagement must function for the benefit of all: employees, leaders, organizations, and customers.

    Employees have higher levels of satisfaction and contribution. Leaders are connected with employees and engaged themselves. The organization is functioning the way it should and customers are receiving the service they deserve.

    Ultimately everyone is getting results that matter to them.

    When this occurs, employee engagement transforms into a more powerful force --- workplace engagement.

  • RSS Zinger's Die Happy Today