As someone devoted to employee engagement for years, I was thrilled to see Engaging for Success: Enhancing Performance through Employee Engagement a comprehensive report coming out of the UK.
It is so encouraging that a major national government is paying so much attention to employee engagement and encouraging business, government, and other organizations to also pay more attention and take action to build awareness and foster action.
Permissions. I was also so pleased to see the open access to the information of this report:
The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified.
What follows are 21 powerful points that stood out for me (The bold text statement at the start of each point is mine while the text that follows is from this comprehensive report). There was much more in the report and this is one individuals early assessment of the wealth of information offered.
Does engagement make a difference? Our answer is an unequivocal yes. In the course of the past eight months we have seen many examples of companies and organisations where performance and profitability have been transformed by employee engagement; we have met many employees who are only too keen to explain how their working lives have been transformed; and we have read many studies which show a clear correlation between engagement and performance – and most importantly between improving engagement and improving performance.
The heart of the workplace. Engagement, going to the heart of the workplace relationship between employee and employer, can be a key to unlocking productivity and to transforming the working lives of many people for whom Monday morning is an especially low point of the week.
Learn how good you can be. As Sir Alan Jones, Chairman Emeritus of Toyota UK told us: “Wherever you work, your job as a manager is to make your people be the best they can be – and usually they don’t know just how good they could be. It’s individuals that make the difference”.
No cookie cutters for employee engagement. The way employee engagement operates can take many forms – that is one of the most fascinating aspects of the topic – and the best models are those which have been custom-developed for the institution.
Get with it people. We hope this report will set out a compelling case to encourage more companies and organisations to adopt engagement approaches. We believe the evidence we cite of a positive correlation between an engaged workforce and improving performance is convincing.
A triple play. Engagement is about establishing mutual respect in the workplace for what people can do and be, given the right context, which serves us all, as individual employees, as companies and organisations and as consumers of public services. It is our firm belief that it can be a triple win: for the individual at work, the enterprise or service, and for the country as a whole.
The scent of engagement. “You sort of smell it, don’t you, that engagement of people as people. What goes on in meetings, how people talk to each other. You get the sense of energy, engagement, commitment, belief in what the organisation stands for,” is how Lord Currie, former Chair of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) and Dean of Cass Business School, puts it. As a number of business leaders told us, “You know it when you see it.”
1 of 50 definitions. “Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their colleagues, managers and wider organisation. It is also about creating an environment where employees are motivated to want to connect with their work and really care about doing a good job…It is a concept that places flexibility, change and continuous improvement at the heart of what it means to be an employee and an employer in a twenty-first century workplace.” (Professor Katie Truss1)
Make it authentic. Although improved performance and productivity is at the heart of engagement, it cannot be achieved by a mechanistic approach which tries to extract discretionary effort by manipulating employees’ commitment and emotions. Employees see through such attempts very quickly; they lead instead to cynicism and disillusionment. By contrast, engaged employees freely and willingly give discretionary effort, not as an ‘add on’, but as an integral part of their daily activity at work.
More than a survey. We have also been struck by the number of people who told us of the equal importance of using instinct and judgment. It is also clear that simply doing a survey and publishing the results is not the same as an engagement strategy. Measuring engagement is simply a tool to allow you to find out how engaged your people are.
Engagement = Performance. Levels of engagement matter because employee engagement can correlate with performance. Even more significantly, there is evidence that improving engagement correlates with improving performance – and this is at the heart of our argument why employee engagement matters to the UK.
Good stuff being done already. These and many other examples suggest that when it comes to engagement, it is not a case of inventing something new; good practice is out there, transforming organisations and transforming lives.
The employee benefit of engagement. Engagement is not just about macro-economics. There is a measurable and significant win for the individual engaged employee. Studies in this field demonstrate beyond doubt that individuals maximise their psychological well-being when they are engaged in meaningful work that provides positive emotional experiences. As our working lives extend with growing longevity, people will want and demand a greater sense of well-being at work.
Happy@Work. Eighty-six per cent of engaged employees say they very often feel happy at work, as against 11 per cent of the disengaged. Forty-five per cent of the engaged say they get a great deal of their life happiness from work, against eight per cent of the disengaged. (Gallup 2006)
4 Major Drivers. 1. Leadership which ensures a strong, transparent and explicit organisational culture which gives employees a line of sight between their job and the vision and aims of the organisation. 2. Engaging managers who offer clarity, appreciation of employees’ effort and contribution, who treat their people as individuals and who ensure that work is organised efficiently and effectively so that employees feel they are valued, and equipped and supported to do their job. 3. Employees feeling they are able to voice their ideas and be listened to, both about how they do their job and in decision-making in their own department, with joint sharing of problems and challenges and a commitment to arrive at joint solutions. 4. A belief among employees that the organisation lives its values, and that espoused behavioural norms are adhered to, resulting in trust and a sense of integrity.
The evidence is there. As John Purcell told us. “Despite the difficulties and weaknesses it is hard to ignore the volume of studies which show, to varying degrees, with varying sophistication, a positive relationship between high performance/involvement work practices and outcome measures.”
Disengagement is more than a bad day. Despite the compelling case for employee engagement, we know that a significant percentage of the workforce feel disconnected from the work they do and the people they work for. Whilst accepting that all of us are capable of having a ‘bad day at work’ we do not accept the inevitability of work being just one bad day after another.
Get planning and doing. Accor report that 75 per cent of leaders have no engagement plan or strategy even though 90 per cent say engagement impacts on business success.
Managing to Engage. An engaging manager is at the heart of success in engaging the workforce. Accenture’s internal research showed that 80 per cent of the variation in engagement levels was down to the line manager. As a result, employees’ most important relationship at work is with their line manager; people join organisations, but they leave managers.
Engaging Manager’s Actions. Firstly, engaging managers offer clarity for what is expected from individual members of staff, which involves some stretch, and much appreciation and feedback/coaching and training. The second key area is treating their people as individuals, with fairness and respect and with a concern for the employee’s well-being. Thirdly, managers have a very important role in ensuring that work is designed efficiently and effectively.
The voice of engagement. The ‘ Sunday Times Top 100 Companies to Work for’ found that feeling listened to was the most important factor in determining how much respondents valued their organisation. Being heard reinforces a sense of belonging within an organisation and a belief that ones actions can have an impact. Richard Baker, Non-executive Chairman of Virgin Active (and former CEO of Alliance Boots) told us: “Employee morale is the first step to productivity improvements. Give your people a damn good listening to, and act on what you learn.”
The MacLeod report. There is much more in this report and it will guide the UK’s employee engagement efforts for the coming year. I strong encourage you to study this report, regardless of what country you are from and join the powerful employee engagement movement.
Click here to download a PDF of the full report and get engaged!
“Get with it people.”
I love it. My favorite of the 21. At some point, you’d think the evidence was so clear and inarguable that everyone would take the plunge.
If not now, when? What more do people need to see? Employee engagement is an obvious winner.
I agree, it is a great report, and it is wonderful that the government is being urged to put its weight (and resources) behind promoting employee engagement.
If I could add a number 22 from the report, my favourite quote is one from Andrew Templeman, of the Cabinet Office
Capability Building Programme who said: “No one ever got a pig fat by weighing it”.
Although measurement (surveys) is an important part of understanding your workforce, real engagement comes from getting down and engaging with your workforce – not just analysing facts and figures.
Richard,
I can’t believe I missed this quote. I am so glad to have you weigh in with #22.
Thank you.
David
Dear David,
This is a very valuable post, it hold true
4ever, and everytime.
Great points , basic common sence, but very difficult to practice.
With Warm Regards.
Wow David. Can’t believe I missed this great interpretation of MacLeod, must have been when the lights went out in my IT world for a little while. The enthusiasm in your piece is brilliant. As one who made a small contribution to the report I’m delighted to see you sharing it in this way. Good work!
David. An excellent article that zeroes in on key aspects of the report. One observation I would offer is that despite being a major report and having significant sponsorship from central government and BIS; there does appear to be a distinct lack of broad business awareness of it amongst employers as to its existence. We will of course continue in our efforts to put raise its profile and get it the airing it truly deserves. Great job.
Christopher:
I have certainly made many people in Canada aware of it as there is much to learn from it here.
Greetings David,
I have not been receiving your past newsletter. Then, suddenl I got the one on “David’s 5 Employee Engagement”. I hope the glitch got solved by itself !
Your work on EE is great and crucial in shifting the awareness into buy-in and action. The entire world has suffered on trust and how else can we ever rebuild if not, as you aptly capture in your defination, with AUTHENTIC and genuiness.
I fully concur and believe it takes leadereship, the first of the 4 drivers to start the ball rolling and to walk the talk. I am beginning to see a major paradigm shift in governments leading the way in adopting transformational changes in management that points towards greater corporate governance and talent management practices. Sad to say, we are not seeing the same level of confidence and “authentic” trust within the bottomom-line profit driven corporate/private sector.
I am of the opinion the professional HR bodies and workforce communities ought to campaign the legitimate need of leadership accountability for the people side of business be given depth and significance in auditing the level of corporate governance. Would a company see and treat EE as a CSF and hold it against the CEO’s KPI.
Instead of waiting for self and market regulations, people should call for stronger representation of “authentic” leadership behaviour and actions. Which is more effective ?. Preaching awareness to those who “just don’t get it” or introducing the necessary regulatory measures in “getting compliance”.
Yuvarajah
Well said and good specifics.
David
Thanks David, this is an extremely valuable synopsis, and another block of evidence for the morale/engagement and performance connection. Loved the quotes, including the one above about weighing the pig not making it fat…priceless! Of course morale/engagement have always been about more than surveys, but this will push that fact forward, without throwing the measurement baby out with the bathwater.
David:
Thanks for the feedback on a short summary of a great report.
David